Mitsubishi Lancer reviews

2010 Mitsubishi Lancer Driving Impressions

Driving impressions of the various models vary quite a bit due to their vastly different performance characteristics.

Fuel economy for the Lancer ES is an EPA-estimated City/Highway 22/30 mpg with its 2.0-liter engine and five-speed manual. The automatic loses just one mile per gallon on the highway. The Lancer ES offers decent steering response and tracks well through corners, with no excessive body lean. It tends to lose some concentration when pointed straight ahead for long stretches. The Civic feels smoother, the Mazda 3 sportier. Brake pedal feel is solid in the Lancer ES.

We find the Lancer GTS a compelling value for its balance of enjoyable driving characteristics and affordable pricing. If you don't need all-wheel drive or turbocharged acceleration, the GTS has the style of the Ralliart for thousands of dollars less. It's smooth, spirited and sporty. Its handing is taut at speeds inside the box, and its ride is comfortable: softer than the Ralliart, but still firm enough for good handling.

And it gets good fuel economy. The GTS with its 2.4-liter engine and manual transmission gets an EPA-estimated 21/28 mpg City/Highway.

The GTS brakes are nicely sensitive, and the five-speed gearbox is positive, easy to shift with slick clutch action. There's enough power from Mitsubishi's new 2.4-liter engine that you can definitely feel the front-wheel torque steer under hard acceleration, something absent in the Ralliart despite its horsepower, thanks to its all-wheel drive.

The GTS is quiet and smooth on the freeway, where 80 mph feels like 70, and that's saying something for a small car with a four-cylinder engine. Those good-looking 18-inch alloy wheels are shod with 215/45 Dunlops, while the Ralliart gets the same size Yokohamas, rated for higher speeds.

The Ralliart seems to run right down the middle of the road between the GTS and the Evo. It uses the newly introduced (for 2008) all-aluminum engine, 2.0 liters with intercooled turbocharging, like the Evo, but milder components keep the Ralliart at 237 horsepower, compared to the Evo's 291 hp. Its electronic all-wheel-drive system, which Mitsubishi calls All-Wheel Control (AWC), can be set for Gravel, Snow or Tarmac, but the system is not as encompassing as the Evo's Super All-Wheel Control (S-AWC, got it?).

The Ralliart lacks the Evo's track-ready suspension (with forged aluminum control arms, quick steering ratio, and big brakes with four-piston front calipers). Instead, the Ralliart's suspension and brakes, upgraded a bit from the GTS, come off the Outlander SUV. Surprisingly, the Ralliart's ride can sometimes feel too firm on the street and wear on you, especially when equipped like our test model, with the Recaro seat package. If you think you can drive your Ralliart like an Evo, you'll be disappointed. Not in the power, but in the handling. The difference is apparently in the simple All-Wheel Control versus Super All-Wheel control. When driven hard through the corners on back roads, the Ralliart will understeer and even lurch as its tires try to bite the asphalt. This happens before the stability control kicks in.

The Ralliart comes with a choice of five-speed manual transmission or six-speed Twin Clutch Sportronic Shift Transmission. The TC-SST as it's called is essentially a manual transmission without a clutch pedal. This twin clutch design now prevails as the method for shifting manual transmissions without a clutch pedal, either automatically or with paddles. Many are built by the German company Getrag, but Mitsubishi builds its own.

On the road with the Ralliart in Washington's Cascade Mountains, we found the Sport Manual mode worked exceptionally well, providing sharper downshifts and quicker upshifts; and Normal Drive works so smoothly you can scarcely feel the relaxed upshifts. But Sport Drive confuses the transmission; it upshifts and downshifts at inconvenient times, inconsistently. The fourth possible mode, Normal Manual, is pretty much a contradiction, unless you just like to play with the paddles. Which, by the way, are about the best in the business. They're graceful magnesium, and long enough that you can reach them with your fingers while your hands remain on the steering wheel at 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock. We preferred Sport Manual for sporty driving, Normal Drive for around town. We found that it takes couple blocks on cold mornings for the transmission to shake off some sluggishness.

As for the Evo, we think it's simply the best. You won't find a car that's more at home on the track than the Evo X, especially not for less than $40,000.

The Evo X is about 320 pounds heavier and has 14 less horsepower than its main rival, the Subaru WRX STi, but it feels more precise and more nimble, thanks to its 13:1 steering ratio compared to the STi's 15:1. The Super All-Wheel Control integrates all of the electronic dynamic controls, including Active Center Differential and Active Yaw Control in the rear differential. The TC-SST transmission has a third mode, called Sport Plus, for the track. You can turn the stability control entirely off, and it still feels balanced on the track. We found the SST Auto mode best for consistently quick runs through an autocross circuit.

We drove three models of Evo at Pacific Races. The Evo GSR, with the five-speed manual gearbox, was great. The Evo MR, with the paddle-shifting sequential manual six-speed, along with Bilstein shocks and lighter rotors ($5000 more), was greater; and the super Evo was the greatest. For another $2500 you get 70 more horsepower, a total of 360, thanks to a freer intake, exhaust, and chip. We hit 140 on the sweeping bend on the front straight, and the Evo tracked steady where a lot of race cars do a scary twitch.

The four-piston Brembos slowed it down to 70 for the turn at the end of the straight, quickly and without drama. A lot of laps were driving on the Evos that day, and the brakes never got soft or faded. Only three laps at a time, but that's more than could be said of most high-performance sedans.

Turbo lag is almost non-existent. Power delivery from the turbocharged 2.0-liter Evo engine is linear, more like a V6.