Jeep Compass vs. Honda CR-V

By

Automotive Editor

John has been a professional writer, editor, and producer for more than 15 years. His work can be found on TV, radio, web, and various publications throughout the world. He is a graduate of Northwestern University and lives in Cincinnati, Ohio. Most important, he boasts a loaded 1992 Cadillac Brougham d’Elegance in his garage.

Follow On: Google+ | Website

, Automotive Editor - November 14, 2013

With so many capable small crossovers flooding the market, some are bound to get lost in the shuffle. One such backbencher is the Jeep Compass, which features mini-Grand Cherokee styling and off-road capability at a reasonable price.

See a side-by-side comparison of the Compass & CR-V >>

Does the Compass deserve more attention than it gets? We compare it to the popular Honda CR-V to find out.

Sizing Up the Compass

Though not intended for heavy-duty adventure, the Compass can be equipped to go places most other crossovers can't. That's a good thing, but the off-road Freedom II package requires the much-maligned continuously variable transmission (CVT) that hampers performance and does nothing to bolster fuel economy. To escape the CVT and get the conventional six-speed automatic, you'll have go with a less capable all-wheel drive setup or standard front-drive, both of which eliminate the Compass's only real advantage.

Ride quality lags behind the competition, and neither of the two available four-cylinders provides anything special in the way of performance or economy. In our search for some redeeming qualities, we found could find no better than average cargo space and towing capability.

CR-V Virtues

The current CR-V is thoroughly up-to-date in design and technology. Its strong suit remains cargo space, up to 71 cubic feet of it, in addition to numerous storage compartments for small items. Instead of a sliding rear seat, the Honda offers spring-loaded seatbacks that fold down automatically when released via a lever. It's a simple but effective system that doesn't require contortions or a motor.

The 2.4-liter four-cylinder delivers 185 horsepower and 26 mpg in combined city and highway driving, or 25 mpg with all-wheel drive. Most drivers will find the CR-V plenty smooth and refined for their tastes, and highly maneuverable in traffic and parking lots.

Does the Compass Deserve a Look?

It's obvious that the Honda offers more space, refinement and versatility. If your top priority is the ability to leave the road when the spirit moves you, then go ahead and test drive the Compass. But be warned: the rough ride and cranky CVT will probably send you into the arms of a 4x4 wagon -- or cause you to rethink your priorities.

Our Verdict: Honda CR-V

Putting the Compass up against the CR-V seems as unfair as sending a third-grader to MIT.

Take a closer look at the Jeep Compass >>

Take a closer look at the Honda CR-V >>

, Automotive Editor

John has been a professional writer, editor, and producer for more than 15 years. His work can be found on TV, radio, web, and various publications throughout the world. He is a graduate of Northwestern University and lives in Cincinnati, Ohio. Most important, he boasts a loaded 1992 Cadillac Brougham d’Elegance in his garage.

Follow On: Google+ | Website

Comments