Mazda CX-5 vs. CX-50

By

Automotive Editor

Based out of the Washington, D.C. area, Joel Patel is an automotive journalist that hails from Northern Virginia. His work has been featured on various automotive outlets, including Autoweek, Digital Trends, and Autoblog. When not writing about cars, Joel enjoys trying new foods, wrenching on his car, and watching horror movies. 

Follow On: Twitter

, Automotive Editor - May 29, 2024
2024 Mazda CX-50

Unlike a lot of other automakers, Mazda has two options in the compact SUV segment. Both the CX-5 and the CX-50 feature enjoyable handling, spunky acceleration, and upscale cabins, which can make choosing between the two difficult.

Shoppers looking to purchase a Mazda CX-5 or CX-50 may find themselves wondering which SUV is the better one to purchase. In this comparison, we’ll look into how the two SUVs stack up to one another when it comes to pricing, size, cargo capacity, engine specs, and fuel economy to help buyers choose the right model for them.

Mazda CX-5 vs. CX-50 Price

2024 Mazda CX-5

Mazda CX-5 prices start at $30,720 and the most expensive Mazda CX-5 costs $42,020. In comparison, the cheapest Mazda CX-50 is priced at $31,720 and Mazda CX-50 prices get as high as $44,720.

There’s a price difference of $1,000 between the entry-level CX-5 and CX-50 in the CX-5’s favor. Comparing range-topping models to one another reveals a price difference of $2,700 between the two compact SUVs.

While the CX-50 is more expensive than the CX-5, Mazda’s lease deals tend to be better for the CX-50. The CX-50 is also available with better purchase deals than the CX-5.

Mazda CX-5 vs. CX-50 Size & Cargo Space

2024 Mazda CX-5 Interior

Both the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 are classified as compact SUVs, but they differ slightly in size. The CX-5 is 180.1 inches long, 72.6 inches wide, and 66.1 inches tall. The SUV rides on a wheelbase that’s 106.2 inches long. The CX-50 is 185.8 inches long, 75.6 inches wide, and 63.5 inches tall. The SUV’s wheelbase is 110.8 inches long. Compared to the CX-5, the CX-50 is 5.7 inches longer, three inches wider, and three inches shorter.

Despite being slightly larger than the CX-5, the Mazda CX-50 has less cargo capacity. The CX-50 has 31.4 cubic feet of cargo space behind the rear seats and a total of 56.3 cubic feet of cargo space. The CX-5 has less cargo capacity behind the rear seats with 29.1 cubic feet of cargo space, but more total cargo space with 59.3 cubic feet of space.

Mazda CX-5 vs. CX-50 Specs

2024 Mazda CX-50 Rear Seats

The Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 share the same powertrains. Both SUVs come with a standard 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine that makes 187 horsepower. The available turbocharged models come with a turbocharged 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine that produces up to 256 hp. Both SUVs come with standard all-wheel drive and have a standard six-speed automatic transmission.

While both the CX-5 and CX-50 share similar powertrains, the CX-50 has the edge when it comes to towing capacity. The CX-5 maxes out at 2,000 pounds, while the CX-50 can tow up to 3,500 pounds.

Shoppers looking to do some light off-roading will want to explore the CX-50. It offers up to 8.3 inches of ground clearance compared to the CX-5’s 7.6 inches of ground clearance. While an extra 0.7 inches of ground clearance may not sound like a lot, it helps the CX-50 better suited at tackling rugged tarmac.

Mazda CX-5 vs. CX-50 Fuel Economy

2024 Mazda CX-50 Engine

With identical powertrains and similar bodies, the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 have similar fuel economy figures. The CX-5 is rated at up to 28 mpg combined with the base four-cylinder engine and up to 24 mpg combined with the available turbo engine.

The CX-50 isn’t as efficient with a combined fuel economy rating of up to 27 mpg combined with the base four-cylinder engine and 25 mpg combined with the turbo-four engine.

CX-5 vs. CX-50: Which SUV Is Better?

The Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 are so evenly matched that deciding which one to purchase may come down to looks and pricing for most shoppers. If you can find one that’s available with a better deal, we’d lean toward that option. We think the CX-50’s slightly more rugged design and more modern interior design make it the better choice over the CX-5. Additionally, shoppers looking to do some light off-roading will appreciate the extra ground clearance, while the extra 1,500 pounds of towing capacity will be appreciated by owners who need to tow some cargo.

The CX-5 may not come out on top in this comparison, but it continues to deliver a premium experience and boasts athletic handling that few can match. It continues to be one of the better compact SUVs on sale today.

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, photos and more!

, Automotive Editor

Based out of the Washington, D.C. area, Joel Patel is an automotive journalist that hails from Northern Virginia. His work has been featured on various automotive outlets, including Autoweek, Digital Trends, and Autoblog. When not writing about cars, Joel enjoys trying new foods, wrenching on his car, and watching horror movies. 

Follow On: Twitter

Privacy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices Disclaimer Cookie Policy Manage Preferences
COPYRIGHT 1999-2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba CarsDirect.com